faculty development session August 16, 2007
pressures involved with faculty and technology–the least reason has to do with student demographics. increased competition is high.
students view education as information delivery
Minn. offers a variety of programs and grants that go across a period of time. start small with a group that you’ll have success with, then go from there. Community is a large component–bill cox on faculty learning communities. Minn’s digital learning workshop breaks down to groups of 3-4 to meet through out the year, where they meet and present. faculty members work with each other across disciplines.
Staff, faculty need people who will help them.
Constant experiment, if faculty can embrace that, and engage in scholarship of teaching and learning, they build in feedback mechanism to respond on how well experiment is going.
Differences of faculty members at stages of career, they offer administrative sign off. programs there for junior faculty, with minimal requirements.
programmatic approach: form alliances and partnerships within constraints of staff, draw on faculty leads, enlist administrative support, align with intitutional strategies/initiatives, know your participants, target marking, motivation, design and implemt of SoTL way (Gillespie, 2002)
start small, have success and reflect back to the community
programs should have learning centered design, promote deep learning, integrate assessment and evaluation and respect and foster community (Bransford, 2001) At Minn. they make sure these principles are apparent in their programs.
They are not sure how to gauge long term results, but have developed a model and hope for more. context, input, process and product [cipp process].




